Retirement Income Planning

,

Can You Move Required Distributions from Your Tax-Deferred Retirement Plan or IRA to Your Roth IRA?

,

Kelsey Arvai Contributed by: Kelsey Arvai, CFP®, MBA

The Center Contributed by: Nick Errer and Ryan O'Neal

Print Friendly and PDF

Required Minimum distributions (RMDs) are the minimum amounts you must withdraw from your retirement accounts each year. You generally must start taking withdrawals from your Traditional IRA, SEP IRA, SIMPLE IRA, and retirement plan accounts when you reach age 72 (73 if you reach age 72 after December 31st, 2022, or 75 if you were born after 1960).

Account owners in a workplace retirement plan (for example, a 401(k) or profit-sharing plan) can delay taking their RMDs until the year they retire unless they own 5% of the business sponsoring the plan.

These amounts vary depending on the value of your account and your life expectancy factor. The amount of your Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) is calculated by dividing the value of your account value at the previous year's end by a life expectancy factor, as determined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). If the sole beneficiary of your IRA is your spouse and your spouse is ten years younger than you, use the life expectancy table from Table II (Joint Life and Last Survivor Expectancy).

For the 2024 tax year, the annual contribution limit to an IRA is $8,000 if you're 50 and older. The limit is the total of all your IRAs – traditional and Roth. (The limits are $1,000 less for anyone under age 50). The IRS requires you to have enough earned income to cover your Roth IRA contributions for the year – but the actual source of your contribution need not be directly from a paycheck. The IRS defines Earned income as any income from wages, salaries, tips, and other taxable employee pay, including self-employment income. However, the IRS does not regulate the pool of money from which the contribution comes. This means you can take your RMD from a Traditional IRA, pay the taxes, and reinvest into your Roth IRA. The only catch is that you would need enough earned income to cover the contribution, but not too much, so you are over the contribution threshold.

The Roth IRA contribution rules are based on your income and tax-filing status. If your modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is in the Roth IRA phase-out range, you can make a reduced contribution. You can't contribute if your MAGI exceeds the upper limits for your filing status. If your RMD was $8,000 or less, you could deposit all the money into your Roth IRA; however, if you contributed $4,000 to another IRA in the same year, you could just place $4,000 of your RMD into a Roth IRA.

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should… 

It is important to remember that no method is perfect for every individual and there are important factors you should consider before reinvesting RMD income into a Roth IRA. Any contribution to a Roth IRA must be held in the account for a five-year period to avoid a 10% early withdrawal penalty. Additionally, converting RMDs to a Roth IRA is not the only reinvestment vehicle you have. Other options include Roth Conversions, 529 Contributions, and Qualified Charitable Distributions. Talk to a financial advisor today to find a solution that works best for you. Reach out to us here or call us at 248-948-7900.

Sources:

Kelsey Arvai, MBA, CFP® is an Associate Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She facilitates back office functions for clients.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.

Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Center for Financial Planning, Inc. is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of the author and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability. Conversions from IRA to Roth may be subject to its own five-year holding period. Unless certain criteria are met, Roth IRA owners must be 59½ or older and have held the IRA for five years before tax-free withdrawals of contributions along with any earnings are permitted. Converting a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA has tax implications. Investors should consult a tax advisor before deciding to do a conversion. Matching contributions from your employer may be subject to a vesting schedule. Please consult with your financial advisor for more information. 401(k) plans are long-term retirement savings vehicles. Withdrawal of pre-tax contributions and/or earnings will be subject to ordinary income tax and, if taken prior to age 59 1/2, may be subject to a 10% federal tax penalty. Contributions to a Roth 401(k) are never tax deductible, but if certain conditions are met, distributions will be completely income tax free. Unlike Roth IRAs, Roth 401(k) participants are subject to required minimum distributions at age 72.

,

Beyond the 4% Rule: Five Strategies to Ensure Your Retirement Income Lasts a Lifetime

,
Print Friendly and PDF

In a prior article, I focused on the popular 4% rule and discussed safe portfolio distribution rates over the course of retirement. While the percentage you are drawing from your portfolio is undoubtedly very important, other factors should also be taken into consideration to ensure the income you need from your portfolio lasts a lifetime.

Asset Allocation

It's common for retirees to believe their portfolio should become extremely conservative when they're in retirement. But believe it or not, having too little stock exposure has proven to do MORE harm than holding too much stock. While having a 90-100% stock allocation is likely not prudent for most retirees, maintaining at least 50-60% in equities is typically recommended to ensure your portfolio is outpacing inflation over time.

Reducing Your Withdrawal Rate

Spending less during market downturns is one of the best ways to preserve your portfolio's long-term value. When I think of this concept, I always go back to March 2020. When the global pandemic hit, the U.S. stock market fell 35% in only two weeks, resulting in the quickest bear market in history.

Due to the COVID-19-induced recession we were living through, we were all forced to dramatically reduce activities such as travel, entertainment, and dining out. This reduced spending for many, which helped tremendously while portfolio values recovered. This highlights the importance of reducing fixed expenses (e.g., mortgage, car payments, etc.) over time to provide flexibility. In years when markets are down significantly, having the ability to reduce variable expenses will prove to be an advantage.

Impact of Fixed Income Sources

Often, we recommend delaying Social Security into your mid-to-late 60s to take advantage of the over 7% permanent annual increase in benefits. It's also fairly common to have pension and annuity income start around the same time as Social Security, which could mean several years of drawing on your portfolio for your entire income need. In many cases, this means a significantly higher portfolio withdrawal rate for several years.

To plan for this short-term scenario with elevated distributions, you might consider holding at least several years' worth of cash needs in highly conservative investments (i.e., cash, money market funds, CDs, short-term treasuries, and bonds). Doing so helps reduce the likelihood of being forced to sell stocks while down considerably in a bear market, something we want to avoid at all costs — especially in the first several years of retirement (also referred to as a sequence of return risk).

Intentional Withdrawal/Distribution Strategy

Being highly intentional about what accounts you draw from and when you draw from them throughout retirement could be a game changer for your long-term financial plan. Chances are, our tax code will change several times throughout your 25+ year retirement. When it does, it's imperative to work with an adviser who understands how these changes could impact your situation and help you plan accordingly.

In some years, drawing from IRAs and 401(k)s and less from after-tax brokerage accounts will make more sense. Then, in other years, it will be the exact opposite. Prudent spend-down strategies, implementing Roth IRA conversions when tax rates are low, and strategically realizing capital gains at preferential tax rates have been shown to increase the "lifespan" of an investment portfolio by 2-3 years.

Part-time Income

Let's be honest – most of us don't want to think about work after retirement. That said, I'm seeing more and more retirees take the "retire from working full-time" approach for several years. In these cases, someone might work 15-30 hours per week at a job they enjoy (or can at least tolerate). This helps reduce distributions from their portfolio during a time when the sequence of return risk is at its peak. I find that most folks dramatically underestimate how valuable even earning $15,000 annually for 2-3 years can be in the long-term sustainability of their overall financial plan.

While working part-time in retirement certainly has its financial benefits, I've also seen it help with the emotional/lifestyle transition to retirement. Going from working full-time for 40+ years to a hard stop can prove challenging for many. Phasing into retirement through part-time work can be an excellent way to ease into this exciting next chapter of your life.

If you're within five years of retirement, I would encourage you to discuss these concepts and ideas with your adviser. Having these conversations early is advisable to ensure a well-thought-out plan is in place to help with your retirement transition.

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Center for Financial Planning, Inc is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation.

,

Is the 4% Rule Dead?

,
Print Friendly and PDF

In 1994, financial adviser and academic William Bengen published one of the most popular and widely cited research papers titled: "Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data," published in the Journal of Financial Planning. Through extensive research, Bengen found that retirees could safely spend about 4% of their retirement savings in the first year of retirement. In future years, they could adjust those distributions with inflation and maintain a high probability of never running out of money, assuming a 30-year retirement time frame. In Bengen's study, the assumed portfolio composition for a retiree was a conservative 50% stock (S&P 500) and 50% in bonds (intermediate term Treasuries).

Is the 4% Rule Still Relevant Today?

Over the past several years, more and more consumer and industry publications have written articles stating that the 4% rule could be dead and that a lower distribution rate closer to 3% is now appropriate. In 2021, Morningstar published a research paper calling the 4% rule no longer feasible and proposing a 3.3% withdrawal rate. Fast forward 12 months later to mid-2022, and the same researchers updated the study and changed their proposed sustainable withdrawal rate to 3.8%.

When I read these articles and studies, I was surprised that none of them referenced what I consider critically important statistics from Bengen's 4% rule that should highlight how conservative this retirement income rule of thumb truly is:

  • 96% of the time, individuals who took out 4% of their portfolio each year (adjusted annually by inflation) over 30 years passed away with a portfolio balance that exceeded the value of their portfolio in the first year of retirement.

Example: A couple with a $1,000,000 portfolio who adhered to the 4% rule over 30 years had a 96% chance of passing away with a portfolio value of over $1,000,000.

  • An individual had a 50% chance of passing away with a portfolio value 1.6 times the value of their portfolio in the first year of retirement.

Example: A couple with a $1,000,000 portfolio who adhered to the 4% rule over 30 years (adjusted annually by inflation) had a 50% chance of passing away with a portfolio value of over $1,600,000.

We must remember that the 4% rule was developed by looking at the worst possible time frame for someone to retire (October of 1968 – a perfect storm for a terrible stock market and high inflation). As more articles and studies questioned if the 4% rule was still relevant today, considering current equity valuations, bond yields, and inflation, William Bengen was compelled to address this. Through additional diversification, Bengen now believes the appropriate withdrawal rate is actually between 4.5% - 4.7% – nearly 15% higher than his original rule of thumb.

Applying the 4% Rule

My continued takeaway with the 4% rule is that it is a great starting place when considering a retirement income strategy. Factors such as age, health status, life expectancy, fixed income sources, evolving spending goals in retirement, etc., all play a vital role in how much an individual or family can draw from their portfolio now and in the future. As I always say – there are no black-and-white answers in financial planning; your story is unique, and so is your financial plan.

Sources for this article includE:

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Center for Financial Planning, Inc is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or a loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is comprised of approximately 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. It is unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.

, , ,

Beat the Squeeze: ACA Income Planning for Pre-Medicare Retirees

, , ,
Print Friendly and PDF

Are you currently retired or planning on retiring before Medicare begins at age 65? If so, congratulations! If you have the ability to retire in your early 60s, chances are that you’ve saved aggressively over the years and have prepared well for retirement. In our experience, the top concern or area of stress for those retiring before 65 is the potential cost of health insurance and the impact it could have on their long-term financial plan.

Prior to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), private health care for those in their early 60s could be rigid and very expensive. Since the ACA was signed into law in 2010, a lot has changed. While certainly not perfect, the ACA now allows individuals to obtain private health insurance, the premiums of which are based on their current or projected income for the upcoming year.

If your income is within a certain percentage of the federal poverty level, you will receive a subsidy on your monthly health insurance premiums. Through recent legislation, these income parameters have substantially expanded, now benefiting individuals and couples with income levels that would previously disqualify them from receiving any subsidy on their health insurance premiums.

Open enrollment for ACA plans typically runs from early November until mid-January. When applying for coverage, you must estimate your income level for the upcoming year. From this information, your potential subsidy is determined.

If your actual income level is higher than projected, you will have to pay back a portion (or potentially all) of your subsidy. Your payback amount will depend on how much higher your income is as compared to your original projection. This determination occurs when you file your taxes for the year. On the flip side, if your income is lower than initially projected, you’ll be entitled to the higher subsidy amount you should have received all along (once again, determined when you file your taxes and received as a tax credit).

If you are someone who has saved very well in preparation for your retirement, you likely have various forms of retirement/investment accounts as well as future fixed income sources, which create retirement income flexibility for you. This flexibility makes it possible to structure a “retirement paycheck” that assures your spending needs are met but with significantly less income reported on your tax return. We call this “ACA income planning,” and it allows you to structure your income in a way that could help save you tens of thousands of dollars in reduced health insurance premiums! Read on as we dive into the details of the key elements of ACA income planning to see if this concept could make sense for you.

Overview of Income Sources

As discussed above, the premiums you pay for pre-65 health insurance are based on your projected modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) for the upcoming year. Because of this, it’s important to understand what constitutes as income in the first place:

  • Employment/Earned Income: Will generally be 100% included in your MAGI for the year.

  • Pension Income: Will generally be 100% included in your MAGI for the year.

  • Social Security: While you may not pay tax on your full Social Security benefit, your ENTIRE monthly benefit (taxable and non-taxable component) is included in your MAGI for ACA income determination purposes.

  • Traditional IRA/401(k)/403(b) Distributions: Because these retirement accounts were funded with pre-tax income, distributions will generally be 100% taxable and included in MAGI.

  • Roth IRA Distributions: Because this retirement account was funded with after-tax dollars, distributions will NOT be taxable or included in MAGI (certain rules such as attaining age 59 ½ and having the Roth IRA open for at least five years will come into play, however).

  • After-Tax Investment or “Brokerage” Account: Unlike 401(k) or Roth IRAs, these accounts are not tax-deferred and were initially funded with after-tax dollars. Capital gains, dividends, and interest (even tax-free, municipal bond interest) produced by the investments within this account will be included in MAGI. However, funds withdrawn from this account that have previously been taxed (the cost basis) will NOT be included in MAGI.

  • Cash: Similar to an after-tax investment/brokerage account, funds initially deposited into a cash account, such as checking or savings, have already been taxed. Because of this, when funds are withdrawn from your checking/savings account for spending, these dollars are NOT included in MAGI.

  • For even more details on various income sources and how they can impact MAGI, please click HERE.

Intentional Distribution Strategy

Because drawing from different accounts will have drastically different tax consequences, it is imperative to have a sound retirement income plan in place while on an individual health care plan before Medicare.

Consider a retired married couple in their early 60s who have saved into other accounts besides 401(k)s or IRAs (e.g., Roth IRAs or after-tax brokerage accounts). Some significant tax and health insurance premium planning opportunities could exist. In many cases, it could be wise for them to spend less out of their pre-tax IRA or 401(k) accounts during this time and take more funds out of Roth IRAs or an after-tax brokerage account. By doing so, income hitting their tax return would likely be significantly less compared to drawing the majority of income from the IRA or 401(k). This, in turn, could qualify them for large health insurance premium subsidies that could save them tens of thousands in the years leading up to Medicare.

Conclusion

As with any retirement income planning strategy, multiple factors must be considered, and the above example is certainly not a one-size-fits-all approach. If you find yourself in this window, where you are on an individual plan before Medicare, I encourage you to discuss your retirement income plan with your adviser. Not doing so could end up costing you thousands in unnecessary tax and insurance premiums.

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Center for Financial Planning, Inc. is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Bob Ingram, CFP® and are not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. and its advisors do not provide advice on tax issues, these matters should be discussed with the appropriate professional.

Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFP®, CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™, CFP® (with plaque design) and CFP® (with flame design) I the U.S. which it awards to individuals who successfully complete CFP Board’s initial and ongoing certification requirements.

,

Required Minimum Distributions (“RMDs”) – Everything You Need to Know

,
Print Friendly and PDF

“What is a required minimum distribution?”

RMDs are the amount you are required to withdraw from your retirement accounts once you reach your required beginning date. Remember all those years you added money to your IRA and 401k and didn’t have to pay tax on those contributions? Well, the IRS wants those taxes EVENTUALLY – which is why we have RMDs. These required distributions ensure that you will spend down the assets in your lifetime, and the IRS will receive tax revenue on that income. 

“When do I have to take RMDs?”

When you turn 73. This age has changed multiple times in the past few years from 70.5 to 72 and is intended to change further to 75 in 2033, but for now, anyone turning 73 in the next nine years will have to begin taking RMDs. You must withdraw the RMD amount by December 31st of each year (one minor exception is being allowed to delay until April in your first RMD year). 

“What accounts do I have to take an RMD from?”

Most retirement accounts such as IRAs, SIMPLE IRAs, SEP IRAs, Inherited IRAs/RIRAs, and workplace plans such as 401k’s and 403b’s require RMDs. RMDs are NOT required from Roth IRAs during the account owner’s lifetime. 

“How much will my RMD be?”

The IRS provides tables that determine RMD amounts based on life expectancy. For anyone taking their first RMD this year at age 73, the current factor is 27.4. So, for example, if you have $500k in your IRA, then you will have to distribute $500k / 27.4 = $18,248. That number may be lower if your spouse is listed as the beneficiary and is more than ten years younger than you. 

“What if I don’t take my RMD?”

There is a 25% penalty on the RMD amount. 

“Can I withdraw more than the RMD amount?”

Yes.

“What if I’m still working?”

For most accounts, such as IRAs, you must still take your RMDs. If you have a 401k with your employer, you may be able to delay RMDs in that account until you retire. 

“Will my beneficiaries have to take RMDs after I am deceased?”

Yes. These rules have also changed recently, and like most things in the IRS, there are plenty of caveats and asterisks, but generally speaking, your beneficiary will have to deplete the account within ten years. Certain beneficiaries, such as your spouse, have more options for determining required distributions. 

Tax-deferred accounts like IRAs and 401ks are a significant part of most retirees’ financial plans, so many of us will have to navigate this topic. We’re proud to say that we’ve been helping clients navigate the maze of retirement accounts, RMDs, and beneficiaries for over thirty years, so we are here to help if you have any questions. 

Nicholas Boguth, CFA®, CFP® is a Senior Portfolio Manager and Associate Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® He performs investment research and assists with the management of client portfolios.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.

Center for Financial Planning, Inc. is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of the author and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability. Conversions from IRA to Roth may be subject to its own five-year holding period. Unless certain criteria are met, Roth IRA owners must be 59½ or older and have held the IRA for five years before tax-free withdrawals of contributions along with any earnings are permitted. Converting a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA has tax implications. Investors should consult a tax advisor before deciding to do a conversion. Matching contributions from your employer may be subject to a vesting schedule. Please consult with your financial advisor for more information. 401(k) plans are long-term retirement savings vehicles. Withdrawal of pre-tax contributions and/or earnings will be subject to ordinary income tax and, if taken prior to age 59 1/2, may be subject to a 10% federal tax penalty. Contributions to a Roth 401(k) are never tax deductible, but if certain conditions are met, distributions will be completely income tax free. Unlike Roth IRAs, Roth 401(k) participants are subject to required minimum distributions at age 72.

,

Strategies to Help Protect Your Income Plan

,
Print Friendly and PDF

In my recent blog focused on the popular '4% rule', we discussed safe portfolio distribution rates over the course of retirement. While the percentage one is drawing from their portfolio is undoubtedly very important, other factors should also be taken into consideration to ensure the income you need from your portfolio lasts a lifetime:

Asset Allocation

  • It's common for retirees to believe their portfolio should become extremely conservative when they're in retirement, but believe it or not, having too little stock exposure has proven to do MORE harm than holding too much stock! While having a 100% stock allocation is likely not prudent for most retirees, maintaining at least 60% in equities is typically recommended to ensure your portfolio is outpacing inflation over time.

Reducing your Withdrawal Rate 

  • Spending less during market downturns is one of the best ways to protect the long-term value of your portfolio. When I think of this concept, I always go back to March 2020, when the global pandemic hit, causing the US stock market to fall 35% in only two weeks. Due to the COVID-induced recession we were living through, we were all forced to dramatically reduce activities such as travel, entertainment, and dining out. This reduced spending for many clients, which helped tremendously while portfolio values recovered. This highlights the importance of reducing fixed expenses over time to provide flexibility. In years when markets are down significantly, having the ability to reduce variable expenses will prove to be an advantage.

Part-time Income

  • Let's be honest – most of us don't want to think about work after retirement! That said, I'm seeing more and more retirees work 15-20 hours/week at a job they're enjoying, which is helping to reduce distributions from their portfolio. I find that most folks dramatically underestimate how valuable even earning $15,000 annually for several years can be on the long-term sustainability of their portfolio. While working part-time in retirement certainly has its financial benefits, I've also seen it help with the transition to retirement. Going from working full-time for 40+ years to a hard stop can prove challenging for many. 'Phasing into retirement' through part-time work can be an excellent way to ease into this exciting next chapter of your life.  

Impact of Fixed Income Sources 

  • Often, we recommend that clients consider delaying Social Security into their mid-late 60s to take advantage of the over 7% permanent annual increase in benefits. It's also fairly common to have pension and annuity income start around the same time as Social Security, which could mean several years when a client draws on their portfolio for their entire income need. In many cases, this means a significantly higher portfolio withdrawal rate for several years. To plan for this short-term scenario with elevated distributions, one might consider holding at least several years' worth of cash needs in highly conservative investments (i.e., cash, money market funds, CDs, short-term treasuries, and bonds). Doing so helps to reduce the likelihood of being forced to sell stocks while down considerably in a bear market, something we'll want to avoid at all costs – especially in the first several years of retirement.

As someone who primarily works with clients either currently retired or within a few years of retirement, I can tell you that completing this retirement income puzzle requires a high level of customization and intention. Over time, your plan and strategy will have to adjust to changes in the market and tax law, to name a few. Please feel free to reach out if you'd like to discuss your plan in greater detail – our team and I are always happy to serve as a resource for you!

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Center for Financial Planning, Inc is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

, ,

Retirement Plan Contribution and Eligibility Limits for 2024 (Additional Updates)

, ,

Kelsey Arvai Contributed by: Kelsey Arvai, CFP®, MBA

Print Friendly and PDF

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced how much individuals can contribute to their retirement accounts and updated figures for income eligibility limits. See this blog from earlier in the month for adjustments to contribution limits and income eligibility limits that are notable as you set your savings targets for the New Year. Below, you’ll find additional updates worth keeping in mind as well.

Saver’s Credit Income Limit (Retirement Savings Contributions Credit):

For low and moderate-income workers, it is $76,500 for married couples filing jointly (up from $73,000), $57,375 for heads of household (up from $54,750), and $38,250 for singles and married individuals filing separately (up from $36,500).

Additional changes made under SECURE 2.0: 

  • The limitation on premiums paid concerning a qualifying longevity annuity contract is $200,000. For 2024, this limitation remains $200,000.

  • Added an adjustment to the deductible limit on charitable distributions. For 2024, this limitation is increased to $105,000 (up from $100,000).

  • Added a deductible limit for a one-time election to treat a distribution from an individual retirement account made directly by the trustee to a split-interest entity. For 2024, this limitation is increased to $53,000 (up from $50,000).

As we begin 2024, keep these updated figures on your radar when reviewing your retirement savings opportunities and updating your financial plan. As always, if you have any questions, feel free to contact our team! 

Have a Happy and Healthy New Year! 

Kelsey Arvai, CFP®, MBA is an Associate Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She facilitates back office functions for clients.

Any opinions are those of Kelsey Arvai, MBA, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Raymond James Financial Services Advisors, Inc.

The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Raymond James does not provide tax or legal services. Please discuss these matters with the appropriate professional.

,

Does the 4% Rule Still Make Sense?

,
Print Friendly and PDF

'4% rule' history

In 1994, financial advisor and academic William Bengen published one of the most popular and widely cited research papers titled: 'Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data' published in the Journal of Financial Planning. Through extensive research, Bengen found that retirees could safely spend about 4% of their retirement savings in the first year of retirement. In future years, they could adjust those distributions with inflation and maintain a high probability of never running out of money, assuming a 30-year retirement time frame. In his study, the assumed portfolio composition for a retiree was a conservative 50% stock (S&P 500) and 50% in bonds (intermediate term Treasuries).

Is the 4% rule still relevant today? 

Over the past several years, more and more consumer and industry publications have written articles stating 'the 4% rule could be dead' and that a lower distribution rate closer to 3% is now appropriate. In 2021, Morningstar published a research paper calling the 4% rule no longer feasible and proposing a 3.3% withdrawal rate. Just over 12 months later, the same researchers updated the study and withdrawal rate to 3.8%!

When I read these articles and studies, I was surprised that none of them referenced what I consider critically important statistics from Bengen's 4% rule that should highlight how conservative it truly is:

  • 96% of the time, clients who took out 4% of their portfolio each year (adjusted annually by inflation) over 30 years passed away with a portfolio balance that exceeded the value of their portfolio in the first year of retirement.

    • Ex. A couple with a $1,000,000 portfolio who adhered to the 4% rule over 30 years had a 96% chance of passing away with a portfolio value of over $1,000,000!

  • A client had a 50% chance of passing away with a portfolio value 1.6X the value of their portfolio in the first year of retirement.

    • Ex. A couple with a $1,000,000 portfolio who adhered to the 4% rule over 30 years (adjusted annually by inflation) had a 50% chance of passing away with a portfolio value of over $1,600,000!

We must remember that the 4% rule was developed by looking at the worst possible time frame for someone to retire (October of 1968 – a perfect storm for a terrible stock market and high inflation). As more articles and studies questioned if the 4% rule was still relevant today, considering current equity valuations, bond yields, and inflation, William Bengen was compelled to address this. Through additional diversification, Bengen now believes the appropriate withdrawal rate is actually between 4.5% - 4.7% – nearly 15% higher than his original rule of thumb!

Applying the 4% rule 

My continued takeaway with the 4% rule is that it is a great starting place when guiding clients through an appropriate retirement income strategy. Factors such as health status, life expectancy, evolving spending goals in retirement, etc., all play a vital role in how much an individual or family can draw from their portfolio now and in the future. As I always say – there are no black and white answers in financial planning; your story is unique, and so is your financial plan! In my next blog, I'll touch on other considerations I believe are important to your portfolio withdrawal strategy – stay tuned!

Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Center for Financial Planning, Inc is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc.

The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS, we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters. You should discuss tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

One cannot invest directly in an index. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

, ,

Secure Act 2.0 Roth Catch-up Change Delayed

, ,
Print Friendly and PDF

In late 2022, Secure Act 2.0 was passed by Congress with the intention of expanding access to retirement savings. The package requires retirement plans to implement many changes and updates based on the new rules. Of the nearly 100 provisions within Secure Act 2.0, only a few went into effect in 2023, and many changes were scheduled to become effective in 2024.

One of these provisions would require future retirement plan catch-up contributions (those ages 50 and over) to be categorized as Roth for participants who earned more than $145,000 in the prior year. Although more employer-sponsored retirement plans have included access to Roth savings over the years, not all plans offer that option to participants. With the new rule, they would either need to offer Roth savings to all employees or remove the option to make catch-up savings contributions for future years.

As the fall open enrollment period for 2024 is quickly approaching, many plan administrators and participants were waiting for guidance on implementing and monitoring this change for 2024. In late August, the IRS announced a two-year delay or “administrative transition period,” meaning that plans don’t need to implement this change until 2026.  

For those retirement plan participants who are 50 and older and contributing more than the base savings amount ($22,500 for 2023), pre-tax catch-up contributions can continue for 2024 and 2025 as they have in the past. For retirement plans that aren’t already offering a Roth savings option, they won’t need to make any changes yet!  

We are monitoring this and future changes as information and guidance are released on Secure Act 2.0 provisions. As always, we are here to help if you have questions on how this could affect you and your financial plan! 

Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™ is a Financial Planning Manager and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® She has more than a decade of financial planning and insurance industry experience.

The information contained in this letter does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Kali Hassinger, CFP®, CSRIC™, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expression of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statement, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability.

, , ,

Impending Social Security Shortfall?

, , ,

Josh Bitel Contributed by: Josh Bitel, CFP®

Print Friendly and PDF

About 1 in 4 married couples, and almost half of unmarried folks, rely on Social Security for a whopping 90% (!) of their retirement income needs. While the Social Security Administration recommends that no more than 40% of your retirement paycheck come from Social Security, the reality is that many Americans depend heavily on this benefit. The majority of Social Security funds come from existing workers paying their regular payroll taxes; however, when payroll is not enough to cover all claimants, we must then dip into the trust fund to make up the difference. According to the 2023 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Reports, the 'trust fund' that helps supply retirees with their monthly benefits is projected to run out of money by 2033. This estimate has many folks understandably worried, but experts have proposed several potential solutions that could help boost solvency.

One popular solution is to raise the age at which retirees are permitted to file for benefits. Currently, a claimant's full retirement age (the age at which you receive 100% of the benefits shown on a statement) is between 66 and 67. Studies published by the Congressional Budget Office show that raising by just two months per year for workers born between 1962 and 1978 (maxing out at age 70) could save billions of dollars annually in Social Security payments, thus helping cushion the trust fund by a substantial amount.

Another hotly debated solution is reducing annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) for claimants. As it currently stands, your Social Security benefit gets a bump each year to keep up with inflation (the most recent adjustment was 8.7% for 2023). This number is based on the consumer price index report and is a tool used to help retirees retain their purchasing power. Recent studies from the SSA show that if we reduced COLA by 0.5%, we could eliminate 40% of the impending shortfall. This goes up to 78% if we assume a 1.0% reduction in COLA. Neither of these solutions completely solves the shortfall, but a combination of COLA reductions and changes to FRA, as shown above, would go a long way toward solving this issue.

These are just a few of the several solutions debated by experts each year. It is important to note that even if no changes are made, current beneficiaries will continue to receive their payments. However, estimates show that if the trust fund ran completely dry, payments may be reduced by as much as 25%. While this is not an insignificant haircut, it is certainly better than cutting payments altogether.

The point is that Social Security is a crucial part of many retirees' livelihoods. It would be safe to assume that Congress would act and make changes before any major benefit cuts are required. These are several options to consider that would have varying impacts on not only solvency but also benefits themselves. If you are concerned about the role of Social Security in your personal retirement plan, discuss with your advisor how these changes may impact you.

Josh Bitel, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® He conducts financial planning analysis for clients and has a special interest in retirement income analysis.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Josh Bitel, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete.

Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Center for Financial Planning, Inc. is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services.

Live YOUR Plan™